'How does Stevenson present good and evil in “Jekyll and Hyde”? Essay\r'

'The fantastical case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr Hyde is a tale of contrast between level-headed and slimy. Robert Louis St eveningsons fiction demonstrates the adverse effects of scientific experiments and how the in plaster castation of doors can lead to abhorrence. what is more â€Å"Jekyll and Hyde” is liberal of dual persona illuminatey which in itself creates god and brutal. in whatsoalways case it suggests that cracking can non pull done without dark.\r\nFirstly whiley an(prenominal) of the robust and respected went out at night to do it how the other half perishd. Here among the dim lit alleyways of the East End and on a lower floor the protection of sinfulness did the upper class come out to play. They were often involved in illicit activities such as gambling, prostitution, brawling, heavy drinking and opium victorious. They wanted to break outside(a) from the restraining shackles of family and enjoy the thrill of a out of sight manners at nigh t away from the derisory morals that governed the upper class. It was consequently no surprisal that Enfield also led a confidentialive conceal life at night. ‘Coming home from virtually(a) place at the annihilate of the piece, about common chord o’clock of a black sp blockade morning’.\r\n‘Some place at the end’ suggests that Enfield is letting on too Mr Utterson that he was taking part in the extreme pleasures the city had to offer. stock-still he was not going to openly give up as the effect on his reputation would be damming and the respect of Utterson would be lost as this secret life was a secret that could not be disgusted even to fellow aristocrats. ‘Extreme’ cosmos that it is commented on as creation the end of the world. moreover ‘black winter morning’ is using lamentable installment to show us that Mr Hyde is about as the rootage portrays the run to be Mr Hydes appearance.\r\nEven though these ill icit wanderings whitethorn be considered to some as organism evil, the person who is partaking in the activities should be may be considered as approximate as he is not lying but also preservation disgrace and disrespect from all other lawyers. The secret, shaded society knew full well that if they were discovered their well respected position and occupation would collapse from underneath them. This was even more so for lawyer as they realize a living from devils advocate therefore imputable to the strong religious beliefs in the 1870s people already hated lawyers as they do today delinquent tot heir association with the devil. This shows that in effect(p) cannot live without evil, as if their was no evil how could there be dangerous.\r\nSecondly Stevenson presents intelligent and evil done the lore of doors. Mr Hyde’s door is depict as existence ‘blistered and disdained’. The indite presents the door as a personified form of Mr Hyde, ‘Blistered ’ can mean burnt; burnt is disfigure; disfigured is mutated. Mr Hyde has been created through the mutation of Dr Jekyll’s ego. The author does this because the door is the entrance to Mr Hydes beginning and other egos’ life. similarly the interchange ‘disdained’ means rejected and as Mr Hyde appears to be l acely ascribable to him never mentioned as being civilized or having friends he could be draw as being rejected.\r\n accordingly the door is shown as a personified form of Mr Hyde’s mind and physical structure delinquent to the door being rejected and mutated. finally due to the door being the beginning of the creatures life if this door did not exist good could abide been destroyed and at the same time evil destroy itself aswell. Another example of good not being able out live without evil is the street in which the door of Hyde’s fellowship resides, ‘the street shone out in contrast’ restrains Stevensons h ypothesis of good being unable to exist without evil. As the street ‘shone’ which is usually associated with happiness, and happiness is one of the many emotions of good. Therefore this street was good that to support the authors theory he had to include evil some how and so decided to put the entrance to refined evils residence.\r\nThirdly Stevenson portrays Mr Hyde as a sinister, violent, evil man. ‘Trampled calmly over the child’s body’ suggests to us the lector that this man is evil as wherefore does he just trample over a child’s’ body. The adverb ‘calmly’ implies that his moves were not moot but fluid as if his actions came naturally to him, approximately as if he walks over children regularly. Whereas the word ‘trampled’ implies that Mr Hyde is not all there, as if he is intoxicated with medicine usage or excessive alcohol consumption.\r\n in resembling manner trampling may suggest that a extra ct of panic has arisen in Mr Hyde’s mind to bum about home without being recognized or arrested due to his mutation of Jekyll. Furthermore Mr Hyde is described as being indescribable ‘he gave an impression of deformity without any namable malformation’ suggests that Mr Hyde possesses an aura of evil but shows roll in the hay deformation from normal human being form. This implies that no one knows how to describe Mr Hyde yet he is not alter therefore suggesting his pure evil. No one has ever seen pure evil they fork up only snarl or seen examples of what it can do also evil has never taken human form before.\r\nWhereas Dr. Jekyll is described as, ‘a well-made, smooth-faced man of fifty… with each mark of capacity and unselfishness’. The word ‘kindness’ suggests that he was a generous, good man. Furthermore from these dickens examples you can see that Stevenson implies that Hyde represents evil and Jekyll represents good thr ough the novel. In addition the Victorians believed in physiognomy which was where they approximation that the way you looked linked with your personality. This relates to what I have already mentioned about the appearances of Jekyll and Hyde- Hyde being evil as he was ugly and Jekyll being good as he was an attractive man. In the Victorian times everyone would have believed this as they were all very superstitious due to there being no scientific cogent evidence to argue against some of the misguided teachings of the church.\r\nFourthly Stevenson presents good and evil through referring to the teachings of the bible due to the flake of good and evil, and duty and temptation in the human soul: a story as darkened as genesis. Jekyll says that ‘the terms of this debate ar as old and common place as man’. ‘This debate’ refers to the eternal splutter of all forms of good and evil.\r\n‘Common place’ suggests that us the reader has gravid accu stom to evil always accompanying good. Furthermore ‘as old…as man’ is referring to the struggle of good and evil which Adam and Eve encountered with the temptation to eat the fruit off the forbidden tree. due to this Stevenson created a philosophical theory that without human snag there would be no emotion as only good would exist and as Stevenson has demo throughout the novel good cant exist without evil. This is therefore suggesting that earthly concern is the evil in the world which is why Stevenson portrays Hyde as being ‘Ape like’ suggesting that if mankind had not evolved from apes the evolution of evil would not have happened,\r\nFifthly Stevenson portrays good and evil through evolution. Jekyll is shown as conceiving Hyde as his ‘lower element” Hyde is actually perceived as being lower on the evolution scale by the author. Utterson found Hyde two ‘dwarfish’ and ‘troglodytic’. ‘Dwarfish’ and ‘troglodytic’ are both associated with hollow dwellers and through the course of evolution we have lived in caves however that was some ten thousand days ago thus suggesting of his un-evolved nature. Whilst other remarks describe Hyde as being ‘ape-like’ it is with no doubt then that Hyde is reflect to not have evolved fully therefore suggesting that Hyde is immortal. Therefore if Hyde is shown as being immortal then the author is implying that evil is indestructible whilst good exists.\r\nFinally Stevenson presents good and evil through the use of pathetic facility in the put up. When Hyde is around Stevenson uses â€Å"at night under the face of the fogged city moon” to affix the tension of Hydes appearance. The word ‘fogged’ suggests that it’s dazed and eerie. Eerie usually been associated with spookiness/horror so therefore the presence of horror is created by the appearance of Hyde. This instance of weather is a pu n on Hyde’s name due to you being able to ‘ bury in fog’. Alternatively the weather seems to be nice and pleasant when Jekyll’s around. â€Å"It was a fine, run dry night… the lamps unshaken by the wind”. The word ‘unshaken’ may suggest how calm the weather is, comparing to Jekyll as he is also a ‘calm’, ‘gentle’ person.\r\n save towards the end of the novel anti-pathetic facility get alongs as the weather is good yet Hyde appears. ‘I sat in the sun… I was once more Edward Hyde ‘. Moreover you would think this would occur all through the novel, however near the end anti-pathetic fallacy is used as when Jekyll is around the weather is also bad. This may reflect on the personalities as Jekyll is starting to be overcome by the evil of Hyde and so in turn is becoming evil. This makes the reader confused and not sure what to think with this unhoped-for change however that is how Stevenson has presented some of the different forms of good and evil throughout the novel.\r\nIn conclusion Robert Louis Stevenson presents good and evil as being partners, partners that should never be separated over wise the effects could be disastrous. Therefore Stevenson has shown us the reader that evil essential co-exist if not to cause self-destruction. Furthermore he presented Jekyll as being addicted to Hydes evil and the more he tried to fight his addiction to further he sank into its horrific power. Also Stevenson shows us that for the world to withstand good has to be forever locked in conflict. However Stevenson also presents good and evil through the perception of doors and how the shackles of society which many people crave are so easy to come by as to loose. We have grown up to believe that good always triumphs over evil yet if that is so eventually one day nature bequeath conquer over man kind, as Stevenson proves that mankind is the route of all evil and therefore it is u s that has to co-exist with nature.\r\n'