Wednesday, February 20, 2019
B. F. Skinner and Albert Bandura
B. F muleteer came up with mule drivers hypothesis of personality. According to the theory, differences in separate mien ar as a result of different kinds of study experience different people encounter. Some of the port pattern whitethorn be learned with direct experience (direct reinforcement) duration others are through observational or sensational learning. Reinforcement tackles a major role in shaping the expression of the learned look. Reinforcement takes third finds. Direct reinforcement involves societal approval or disapproval and existent rewards.Vicarious reinforcement involves observing some unitary receive a reward or punishment for behavior similar to his/her hold behavior. Self administered reinforcement is whereby a person evaluates his/her own performance with self honor or check (Zillman and Bryant 2001). Therefore, a given behavior in a specific state of affairs will bank on the likely result. According to Bandura social cognitive theory, behav iorism is based on the concept that information is cultured and is natural to environmental incidentors.1). The theory put more stress in the fact that environment, behavior and cognition work together and hence wield distinguished influence among each other (Travers 2001). In personality development, Albert Bandura came to a remnant that environment causes behavior while on the other hand behavior causes environment. This factor led to Banduras imagination of reciprocal determination and had a belief that an action of an someone and the action of his environment are coupled together. According to his theory, personality development comes as a result of relations mingled with environment, psychological process and behavior of an individual(a) (Travers 2001).2). Discuss the similarities in the midst of each theorists ideas of personality Theories by B. F Skinner and Albert Bandura played a great role in the environmentalist imply of view of development. The two theories a re similar in stating that the environment shape learning and the behavior of an individual from childhood do to adulthood stage (Travers 2001). Both theories recognize the significance of reinforcement in learning and behavior. In both case, motivation is embedded and reinforced by the consequences and so maven can easily learn if he/she values the consequences and also one can be reinforced vicariously.In both the theory, the individual is at the bear on stage of determining his/her behavior. In skinner theory, self administered reinforcement play a major role in self criticism or honor and so he/she can decide on what behavior to adopt without influence from another party. This fact is the same as in Albert Bandura theory of personality where an individual has self regulatory mechanism which go away for the potential for self directed change and for the capability of one influencing his own behavior (Zillman and Bryant 2001). This is inclined to self observation, self decisio n and self-reaction.3) Discuss the differences between the theorists ideas of personality (include any reasoning for the differencespersonal history B. F. Skinner theory of personality differ with Albert Bandura social cognitive theory in that it undertake that a behavior was only as a reaction of environmental stimuli while social cognitive theory state that behavior of an individual can be modified by external stimuli while position into consideration the fact that learning can take place through copying. Albert Bandura also state that learning also take a cognitive perspective.Skinner theory of personality provides room for operant conditioning while Bandura social cognitive theory does not. In Skinner theory of personality, the behavior is influenced by the environment and it is a one way tier while in Albert Bandura social cognitive theory, the behavior of an individual is influenced by the environment while at the same time, the environment is influenced by the individual be havior and so it is a two way tier. 4) Discuss each theorists ideas concerning the role of society in the development of personality and any developmental stagesAlbert Banduras idea about the role of society concerning the development of personality and any developmental stage in cognitivism, behavior is guided by cognitions about the world. The cognitive theories are personality theories which stress on cognitive processes like thinking and offering judgment. Banduras theory further draws the greatness of modeling through the social cognitive theory, in that as a result of direct training of an individual in the society or conditioning (for instance through reinforcement a child is subjected to such(prenominal) as punishment) models behavior hence development of personality (Travers 2001).Through the influence of the society, an individual learns several issues from childhood which help in development of personality. Through this idea of social learning, the role played by role mo dels in development of personality becomes very significant. B. F. Skinner also gives a perspective of personality development that is based on learning through others in the society.Skinner (Quoted in Travers 2001 156) also further notes that the adolescent stage of human development requires that the constructive behaviors exhibited by the adolescents since adolescents are more vigorous in repeating the behavior for which they have obtained reinforcement.Reference List Travers, F. , John, (2001). Human growth and development through the life Jones & Bartlett Publishers Zillman, D. and Bryant, J. (2001). Media effects Advances in theory and research 2nd Edition, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Hillsdale
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment