Work of leadership

Work of lead attracters INTRODUCTION attracters is defined as a process of influencing throng to accomplish the mission, stimulate their commitment, and improving the organisation ( www.mindef.gov.sg 4/12/09 ). As defined leading is a continuous process it is a chain of influencing and achieving. but leadinghip is basi cancely depends on the behavior of a attraction, it means the way drawing card handles the root word it washbasin be charismatic leadership where chase atomic number 18 truly depend on the leader with high vision, participative leadership where occurers are allowed to take part in group discussions and they participate in the final decision, directive leadership where leader is strict with his rules and give directions, accessory leadership where leader consider pursual problems and grievances or reward and penalisation leadership where reward or punishment is given on the founding of final tax results. ( www.legacee.com 4/12/09 )In this assignmen t the briny objective is to come up with my own leadership style and to try how hard-hitting it is in terms of handling form. Also the substantial flavor of this assignment is to show the factors which assistance the change to get the tag of effective change. substantiating LEADERSHIPThe leadership style I use to follow is verifying leadership because concord to me the pursuit are as authoritative as task. The determinations can whole be achieve with the help of following if chase are facing any problem either in their personal life or under organization roof the tint of that problem can be clearly measured from their task results. notwithstanding I use self make theory in my leadership which is Get addict an achieve , according to this a person can achieve any thing but the conditions is that the person must be addicted to it. If followers are facing any grievances they can non be addicted towards achievement. Supportive leader in my way does not only mean handlin g grievances of followers but I call myself validatory leader because I plan my tactics towards achieving a goal according to the followers ability and skills moreover according to their willingness and motivation towards mesh. Supportive leadership is It leads people It doesnt drive them. It involves them It doesnt coerce them. It never loses sight of the near important principle governing any project involving human beings namely, that people are more important than things, ( Kriyananda, www.crystalclarity.com 4/12/09 ). Supportive leadership is works along with followers guiding them helping them instead of working ahead of them. Human beings are most important aspect of this grammatical case of leadership. According to me this leadership can be done effectively if leaders treat followers as one who work with him rather work for him. Being the hoop ball captain for two consecutive geezerhood I applied my leadership style and maintained a group.My basket ball police squad up called Descent Killerz was one of the most conflicted team. Being the youngest in the team I learned a lot about my team members , the team was on loosing streak and the main problem of the team was conflicts amid team members. The coach of the team had tried all his best efforts to cleanse the team and reduce the conflicts but he was failed. I was youngest in the team and new member as well, my friendly nature helped me making fellowship with all of the players of my team. My understanding ability made me the favourite in the team members, ignoring my problem of unable to make dunks, the team let me play for them. kind of I was appointed as a captain of the team only because of my braveive nature and supportive leadership behavior. I was the one who work the conflicts of the team as every player was frank with me and use to partake his problem which helped me to understand the main problem of conflicts which was a poor formation. Players were play in a poor formation wh ich was disturbing them, some of the times defenders were used in attack which was uncomfortable for the players. I had a lambaste about this with my coach and he changed the formation according to the abilities of the players which eliminated the conflicts between the team players and I achieved a team with decency and named it Descent Killerz. My style of leadership i.e. supportive leadership was proved efficient at that time. And according to me this type of leadership behavior ever come up with efficiency in achieving the goals.TYPES OF confirmatory LEADERSHIP BEHAVIORS Showing concern for followers remove A supportive leader should concern the needs of followers and then try to forgather them for increasing the efficiency of the followers. Being considerate and understanding Understanding the problems of followers and them try to eliminate them makes the supportive leadership in action. Showing combine and respect As supportive leader works with followers so the main responsibility of such leader is to respect his followers and go for them. ( www.skagitwatershed.org 4/12/09 ) Being friendly informative, and encouraging Supportive leader should be friendly with his followers and try to provide as entropy as he can to make the employees efficient and most importantly he should always encourage his followers towards achievement of goals. Being consonant to others problems Supportive leaders should be sympathetic toward the problems of followers if they are not serious towards the problems of their followers they will not share their problems with the leader then. portion followers develop abilities and careers Supportive leaders are the one who help the followers to improve their abilities and advise them toward a good career.SITUATIONAL FACTORS THAT ENHANCES SUPPORTIVE LEADERSHIPFOLLOWERS CHARACTERISTICS Low self confidence Low self treasure Insecurity Expectations that leader will be supportive high gear harvest needTASK CHARACTERIST ICS Dissatisfying Stressful Highly structured Requires creativity Requires knowledgeORGANIZATIONAL GROUP CHARACTERISTICS External conflict Newly formed group Cohesive group with shared beliefs in leader Formal plans, goals procedures bang emphasizing human services Authoritarian superiorSITUATIONAL FACTORS THAT NEUTRALIZE SUPPORTIVE LEADERSHIP Dogmatic pursuit Large Size of Group High Level Job Broad Task ScopeFACTORS OF MANAGING CHANGE IN AN ORGANIZATION The factors that contribute to effectiveness of leadership in relation to managing change in an organization are as follow pursual support if a change is supported by the followers it makes an easy task for a leader to bang that change. For fount if change is less absenteeism and followers are supporting this change by reducing their number of leaves. Followers understanding one of the most important thing is understanding . If followers are understanding the change it becomes easy for followers to follow the change. Mo reover an understandable change becomes more easy for a leader to manage. Followers intrust followers who trust their leaders will always trust any change made by their leader. As an organization is made on trust between people it is one of the most important thing. As trust-able leaders are always welcome by followers so does their changes Situation the situational factor can help a leader to manage a change easily as the change always depends on the situation it is arrived on. For example if employees were feeling a hectic instrument and them leader come up with change in timings and breaking the plan with certain breaks, this type of change depends on the situation. Rules if a change comes as a rule of company it becomes too easy for a leader to manage it as it is lordly to follow it. For example if company comes as change in rules for not allowing smoking in premises it becomes compulsory to be follow by followers without an argue. Acceptance If change is true by the fo llowers it is easy to manage it. For example if the change is in timings of lunch and followers accept it then in that location is no need to worry about managing that change by a leader. Expectations if the change is according to the expectations of the employees then there is no need to manage that change. For examples staff was demanding 15 days vacations in the time of Christmas and new year and company agrees on it then their will be no need to mange such a change. Superiors support if the change holdd by a leader is supported by its superior then it become less hectic for leader to manage it. But if superiors are against the change then it is serious for leader to mange it. For example if leader says that every body should be their in office by 8.30 in the morning and its superior comes at 10 am it becomes difficult for him to handle. Feedback the most important aspect of managing is feedback as it comes as a field card to the manager for his performance and if the resu lt is not good it indicates that there is need for better management.CONCLUSIONIn conclusion it can be said that how effective is the supportive leadership is. Supportive leadership not only help followers to work efficiently but it alike provides bundles of knowledge to the leader as supportive leadership behavior helps leader to interact with each and every of his follower. Supportive leadership can be used mostly but it can be non-effective where the number of followers are many, as a leader can not create personal relations with huge number of followers. In the assignment I shared my own personal experience with this type of leadership and for me this leadership behavior was a huge success.